COMPARE

[{"writerId":"brugler","name":"Dane Brugler","org":"The Athletic","verdict":"Brugler is what accountability looks like. He correctly called the Penix-to-Atlanta shocker at #8 — one of the only analysts to do so — and nailed picks 1–7, 9–15, and a majority of the board. His player evaluation methodology (not relying on rumors) paid off. Best overall mock in the 2024 class. The Athletic draft coverage is worth every penny.","trust":100,"exactHits":32,"playerHits":0,"posHits":0,"proximity":0,"chaosBonus":0,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.nflmockdraftdatabase.com/mock-drafts/2024/the-athletic-2024-dane-brugler","mockSourceLabel":"NFL Mock Draft Database (The Athletic board)"},{"writerId":"reuter","name":"Chad Reuter","org":"NFL.com","verdict":"Reuter's chaos-mock approach (multiple speculative trades) significantly hurt his final score. While he got many of the headline picks right (1–7, Bowers, Latu), his trade scenarios cascaded errors through the middle of the board and left him with glaring misses in positions he should have nailed. NFL.com in-house coverage has better access than his results suggest.","trust":64,"exactHits":21,"playerHits":0,"posHits":2,"proximity":5,"chaosBonus":-6,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.nfl.com/news/seven-round-2024-nfl-mock-draft-round-1","mockSourceLabel":"NFL.com seven-round Round 1"},{"writerId":"pff","name":"PFF Draft Team","org":"Pro Football Focus","verdict":"PFF's data-driven approach paid dividends. They correctly called the Atlanta Penix shocker (pick 8) — a genuinely bold call that almost nobody else made. Their player grades and positional value analysis showed in how accurately they mapped positions to teams. Lost points in the 20–27 range where team intel is crucial. The speculative early trade knocked them slightly.","trust":64,"exactHits":19,"playerHits":0,"posHits":2,"proximity":9,"chaosBonus":-2,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.pff.com/news/draft-trevor-sikkema-final-2024-nfl-mock-draft","mockSourceLabel":"PFF final mock (Sikkema)"},{"writerId":"kiper","name":"Mel Kiper Jr.","org":"ESPN","verdict":"Kiper's final mock was sharper than his reputation suggests. He correctly called Alt to LAC, Nabers to NYG, McCarthy to MIN, Bowers to LV, Verse to LAR, Worthy to KC, Guyton to DAL, Pearsall to SF. His player evaluation is elite even when team slot is off. Still got burned by the Atlanta Penix surprise.","trust":62,"exactHits":18,"playerHits":0,"posHits":0,"proximity":11,"chaosBonus":0,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2024/insider/story/_/id/40018136/2024-nfl-draft-mel-kiper-round-1-predictions-buzz-notes-qbs-trades","mockSourceLabel":"ESPN+ Round 1 (draft week)"},{"writerId":"jeremiah","name":"Daniel Jeremiah","org":"NFL Network","verdict":"Jeremiah's NFL connections show in his team-pick accuracy. He correctly mapped Bowers to LV, Latu to IND, Worthy to KC, Guyton to DAL, Pearsall to SF, Legette to CAR — all picks with real source-work behind them. The Nix/Penix confusion in Denver/Minnesota cost him. His overall player-in-round-1 rate was excellent. A legitimate top-tier resource.","trust":59,"exactHits":16,"playerHits":0,"posHits":2,"proximity":13,"chaosBonus":0,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.nfl.com/news/daniel-jeremiah-2024-nfl-mock-draft-4-0","mockSourceLabel":"NFL.com mock 4.0"},{"writerId":"mcshay","name":"Todd McShay","org":"The Ringer","verdict":"McShay nailed the top of the board — the QB run and skill position players were sharp. His intel on team needs (Eagles CB, Colts EDGE, Raiders TE) was legit. Lost points in the 25–32 range where team-specific intel gets murkier. No garbage trade mocks. One of the most consistent final-mock performers in the business.","trust":55,"exactHits":14,"playerHits":0,"posHits":4,"proximity":13,"chaosBonus":0,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.theringer.com/2024/04/22/nfl/2024-nfl-mock-draft-predicting-every-pick-first-round","mockSourceLabel":"The Ringer — Round 1 mock"},{"writerId":"miller","name":"Jordan Reid / ESPN Draft Team","org":"ESPN","verdict":"A trade-heavy mock designed for clicks more than accuracy. Getting the positions 4–6 swapped (Nabers/MHJ/Alt) cascaded into errors through the entire board. Missing Bowers to LV at #13 (one of the most locked-in picks) is particularly damning. The speculative trades did not materialize and penalized the score. The kind of mock that gets retweets, not respect.","trust":43,"exactHits":12,"playerHits":0,"posHits":2,"proximity":15,"chaosBonus":-4,"mockSourceUrl":"https://www.espn.com/nfl/draft2024/insider/story/_/id/40006708/2024-nfl-mock-draft-matt-miller-first-round-32-picks-final-predictions","mockSourceLabel":"ESPN+ final mock (Miller)"}]